tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371203489316363738.post386984224604250314..comments2024-01-30T07:41:20.885+00:00Comments on Broken Barnet: One Barnet: Appeal? What Appeal? This is Capitaville: signed, sealed, delivered ... Mrs Angryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00586223909475832791noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371203489316363738.post-43434597232245178862013-06-20T14:51:00.534+01:002013-06-20T14:51:00.534+01:00Mrs Angry , First off well done on your fabulous B...Mrs Angry , First off well done on your fabulous Blog & poor ole st Nick , having to put up with you as a sister , But on to the point ! Barnet is experiencing a Revolution ! That being we the common people Raising up & shouting Load & Clear Enough ! Can I emplore Every Right Thinking Person in this Borough to come together & Vote for a coalition of new councillors into office , To take Our Borough Back ! & then there first Vote should Be , to Hold those councillors & officers fully financially responsible for there illegal & unconstitutional conduct ! Maybe the thought of possible Bankruptcy might Focus there minds ! Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05224804477857280996noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371203489316363738.post-85522237499910560362013-06-10T17:22:39.482+01:002013-06-10T17:22:39.482+01:00To sign now would need a whole new agreement to be...To sign now would need a whole new agreement to be drawn up with costings for undoing what has been done and would probably take until October to draft in view of the complexity of this over-blown mass privatisation contract and so it is probably commercial reality that has taken over.<br /><br />If the council do win in October there will only be about 6 months remaining between actually starting with Crapita and the next elections and the Cornelius Clique (copyright: Brian Coleman) possibly finding themselves unseated. So no mandate to carry out One Barnet in the first place and only 5% of the NSCSO Contract they do sign could have passed before the Cornelius Clique are history. Doesn't seem right somehow.Mr Mustardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12522242686839965655noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371203489316363738.post-19377274005038459402013-06-09T23:46:14.470+01:002013-06-09T23:46:14.470+01:00Not the same, is it, Baarnett? Have they abolished...Not the same, is it, Baarnett? Have they abolished the Star Chamber too?Mrs Angryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00586223909475832791noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371203489316363738.post-20641434074259639732013-06-09T23:02:15.402+01:002013-06-09T23:02:15.402+01:00It's not the House of Lords, now, as Mrs Angry...It's not the House of Lords, now, as Mrs Angry will know anyway, being omnipotent. It's the Supreme Court.<br /><br />baarnetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12301292285255035403noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371203489316363738.post-2173468890345327782013-06-07T18:14:18.393+01:002013-06-07T18:14:18.393+01:00Hmm: not sure, Baarnett: obviously Mrs Angry is an...Hmm: not sure, Baarnett: obviously Mrs Angry is an expert in audit, and procurement law, and oh, you know, everything, really, but the House of Lords? Dunno. I have a vision of Clive of India, and the impeachment of Warren Hastings, trial by his peers and all that: is it relevant, Mrs Angry? Not in the slightest.Mrs Angryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00586223909475832791noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6371203489316363738.post-62479629789541805692013-06-07T10:36:08.993+01:002013-06-07T10:36:08.993+01:00If one side loses in the Court of Appeal, could it...If one side loses in the Court of Appeal, could it (the little matter of the cost aside) go on to the House of Lords?baarnetthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12301292285255035403noreply@blogger.com