Death and taxes: Tory parking policy in Broken Barnet

A horribly familiar face at the protest

*see below for footage

Mrs Angry has just returned from North Finchley, where this morning local shopkeepers held a protest to express their fury over the devastating effects on their businesses by the Tory council's new parking scheme.


Local West Finchley Labour Councillor Jim Tierney came to support Cafe Buzz owner and traders' representative Helen Michael, who organised the protest.


The death of a town centre: killed by Tory parking policy, the last nail in the coffin of a local economy struggling to survive the recession.

Brian Coleman lives nearby, of course, in his charity owned, fixed rent flat, within a short walking distance of these shops. He isn't known for his love of walking, however, and would probably be best advised not to show his face in North Finchley, or any town centre other than the favoured Chipping Barnet street where he and his Conservative councillor cronies have their Association offices.

In the real, real world of Broken Barnet, since the introduction of the new parking scheme, shops and small businesses have seen their trade slashed almost overnight, as the new cashless system and rates of charge have led to an abandonment of the high street by local customers.

Many shops are reporting a loss of up to 40% in trade and, already, some long established independent shops are closing down: this morning Mrs Angry heard that now one well known high street chain has taken the decision to cut its opening time in response to falling sales. The effects of this idiotic, irresponsible policy will be fatal for our local town centres, and unless it is retracted immediately, will precipitate an irreversible process of terminal decline in the local economy.

Do they care, the Tory councillors? Because we should not lay all the blame on Coleman, tempting though it is. He is a fool, and cares only about getting his own way. What about the rest of them? Where are the voices of the Tory councillors who privately howl in despair over his behaviour and his policies, but seem totally unable to oppose them. What is stopping them?

There has never been more antagonism felt in this borough towards the local council as there is now. Every driver and local trader in the borough has been politicised by the parking changes, and the Tory vote has been fatally injured, only three months before the London elections. Tory councillors in Barnet, no doubt, are hoping that all this unpleasantness will have died down before the next local elections: if so, they are deluding themselves.

More immediately, though, it is very interesting to reflect on the effect on the GLA and Mayoral elections: the already unpopular Coleman is looking set to lose his place, and the toxic effects of what is happening here is badly damaging the weakening position of Boris Johnson too. Dear, dear: how very unfortunate.

Mr Lynton Crosby: I think you need some more campaign advice.

You have my email address, don't you?

Mrs Angry, x

(Interim consultant, Sack Boris 2012)

...and now here is some footage, thanks to the Barnet Eye, especially as Mrs Angry now realises she needs her highlights doing.

Outsourcing: Tory flagship council Suffolk bottles it

I've just heard some news that should be rattling the nerves of even the most the dimwitted of our grasping, dopey Tory councillors here in Broken Barnet: on the eve of local elections, the Conservative run Suffolk County Council has taken fright, and decided to announce a dramatic u turn in its plans to implement a hugely controversial agenda of massive service outsourcing.

According to an online story in the Guardian by Patrick Butler, http://m.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/may/04/suffolk-virtual-council-plan?cat=society&type=article - a political revolt by Tory backbench councillors was triggered by public opposition to cuts and a collapse in staff morale.

Last month, in fact, the former Tory leader, Jeremy Pembroke, stepped down during a period of increasing concern and new leader Mark Bee has taken over. He has promised ' a period of reflection' and to put the issue of staff morale as a priority in a new approach by his administration, following a whistle blowing letter sent to all councillors by someone believed to be an employee, in which references were made to the 'poisonous atmosphere that exists at present' within the council.

Suffolk County Council is run by the much written about Andrea Hill, one of the country's highest paid Chief Executives, paid £218, 000 a year in a county where the average salary is £23,000, and according to some reports, where half of the county's council workers earn less than £17,000 a year. She has presided over the rush to implement what is officially labelled 'the new strategic direction', and slashed budgets, even to the point of dumping all £35 a week lollipop ladies, whilst being accused of sanctioning ludicrious training courses for senior staff, including a £6,ooo splurge on a team building exercise for senior officers which included, oh dear: chocolate making, drumming and singing exercises ...

Now you may be forgiven, citizens of Broken Barnet, for thinking this is all too familiar. A Chief Executive paid more than the Prime Minister, public money wasted on self indulgent 'training' for senior staff, and all in the name of a council ideologically obsessed with outsourcing on a massive scale, endangering the safe delivery of frontline services to local residents. Hmm. I note the reference to a poisonous atmosphere: this almost exactly echoes the remark made to me by a senior officer from Barnet, who spoke of the appalling pressures, intense anxiety about redundancies and 'toxic' working environment in his department. Speak to any Barnet union representative about the state of morale throughout the whole authority, and you will understand just how bad things are here now.

Call it 'the new strategic direction', or One Barnet: it's the same stinking mess, and now, under pressure from central government fretting about an election, in the former Tory flagship council in Suffolk, it's being swept right out of the door.

In the Guardian article, shadow communities and local government secretary Caroline Flint is quoted as saying:

"I'm all in favour of innovation and efficiency in local government, but the Conservatives running Suffolk county council have decided to put party political ideology ahead of running effective local services – and it's backfired.
"There is also a lesson for David Cameron and [the communities secretary] Eric Pickles here. Pushing through half-baked Tory experiments and ignoring the wishes of local people is more likely to put frontline services at risk than improve them."

Quite.

A note to the backbench Tory councillors of Barnet: is any of this striking a chord? No? Thought not.

Andrea Hill wrote an article in a council magazine in which she defended the now abandoned strategy. Referring to the reaction to the plans she wrote:

"It's not an easy or comfortable place to be because we are challenging the old ways of doing things. We are developing a new model that will unsettle the status quo and, as we all know, any change makes ordinary people uncertain. Changing the system challenges vested interests and will therefore be attacked ..."

Ah: and therein lies the difference between Suffolk and Barnet. The vested interests in One Barnet are all on the side of those pushing for outsourcing: politicians and private contractors. You don't have to look very far to see who benefits from the extension of private contracting in this borough,and anyone who has followed the development of recent stories in our local blogs knows what I'm talking about.

It really does stink, doesn't it?