Showing posts with label Tory councillors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tory councillors. Show all posts

Monday, 1 July 2013

A rural idyll: tea, teasels, toads, and Tory councillors - Long Lane Pasture



Finchley Labour councillors Arjun Mittra, Jim Tierney and Alison Moore

What would be your ideal summer Sunday afternoon? Pottering about in the garden? Watching cricket on the village green? In the crowd at Glastonbury? Or stuck in a field in Finchley with Brian Coleman, trying to resist the temptation to push him and his strawberry tea into a large pond?

Yes, a surreal afternoon yesterday for Mrs Angry, who had been invited by a friend to the unveiling of a new panoramic guide at Long Lane Pasture, a local open space and wildlife sanctuary only round the corner from home, yet somewhere she had never been, one of the secret places of Finchley, known only to a handful of doughty volunteers - and a large number of local politicians always ready to take the credit for a successful local voluntary project, of course.

It is all the more extraordinary not to have visited the place before, because Mrs Angry used to have one of the allotments on the land adjoining the site: originally both areas were part of land bought in 1912 by Finchley Urban District Council for 'public enjoyment and recreation', part of which was converted to allotments during the war. 

(If you are interested in knowing more about the local geography of this area, and indeed elsewhere in North London, you might be interested in the rather idiosyncratic website of Nick Papadimetriou, here - a local writer who has a unique knowledge of the underlying geography and history of the borough). 

The remaining section of this site is now a meadow managed by the Long Lane Pasture trust - see their website http://www.longlanepasture.org/index.html and it is home to a wide selection of wildflowers, everything from cow parsley to woody nightshade, and a full range of wildlife is regularly to be seen there - woodpeckers, voles, slow worms, toads - and Tory councillors, in abundance yesterday, observed in an unfamiliar habitat, where no one was shouting at them, or serving them with notice of a Judicial Review ...

The Pasture land was well used by local people until the 80s, when plans to widen the North Circular led to access being stopped, and when that came to nothing, a threat came in the shape of a proposal to build a housing development there. 

Coleman tweeted yesterday:


off to visit that rural idyll Long Lane Pastures saved from Fairview Homes by me, and others and run by excellent volunteers

Hmm. Saved by Brian Coleman: Mrs Angry thinks it is fair to say the site was in fact saved by the marvellous volunteers and acitivists in the community who worked to defeat the developers, organising a petition and campaign supported by local people, and that if the same site was available today, it would, along with our former museum, assorted libraries and anything else that isn't nailed down, be up for sale to the first bidder by our profiteering council.

Mrs Angry had gritted her teeth in anticipation of seeing local MP Mike Freer, but was surprised, and yet not surprised, to see on arrival the familiar figure of his disgraced former Tory colleague standing in the marquee scoffing cream scones and holding court. Mrs Angry smiled to herself, inclined to be indulgent for once, reflecting on the possibility that this pastoral interlude may not be altogether representative of the week ahead, for our ubiquitous friend. 

Clearly Freer is still on good terms with Coleman, despite his recent criminal conviction for assault and expulsion from the Conservative party: incredible, is it not, that neither Freer, nor any other Barnet Tory MP or councillor has had the decency to condemn what was a totally unacceptable act of violence against a woman? In fact, not incredible, entirely predictable, and exactly what one might expect from the institutionalised misogyny that is the mark of Conservatism in this borough. None of them seem to understand or care about the implications for other women who are the victims of male violence, in whatever context.

Also present was Tory councillor and Finchley Forum Chair Graham Old, who may well have wanted to push Mrs Angry in the pond after last week's meeting, but was perfectly charming and this, Brian, is how you are meant to behave with people who dare to hold different views to your own, did you know? 

Councillor Old

Local Labour councillors Arjun Mittra, Jim Tierney, and leader Alison Moore attended too: but of course the most important people there were the volunteers and supporters of Long Lane Pasture like Ann Brown, Donald Lyyven, and unsung hero Dennis Pepper, who does so much to safeguard the future of our open spaces in Finchley. Why has he not had a civic award? Doesn't hang out with enough Tory councillors, probably.


Dennis Pepper and wife Anne

Mike Freer turned up and grudgingly shook hands with Mrs Angry, who promptly and rather naughtily pointed out to the assembled guests that he was the only person, apart from Miss Angry, to block her on twitter, presumably for very different reasons. He replied, oh well, you should try saying something nice about me. Like f*ck, thought Mrs Angry, smiling politely: oh ... she replied, you mean, I say what you don't want to hear ...

Time for the unveiling: off we went, like characters in a dream, familiar faces in an absurd context, political enemies escaped from the Town Hall and trailing through waist-high grassland, in the soft focus sunlight of a summer afternoon, along the teasel-edged paths up towards the high viewpoint. Mrs Angry kept a discreet distance from Himself and his mother, beside herself with amusement, as a kestrel hovered hopefully over the field, looking for prey. 


 MP Mike Freer

 The new plaque describing the rather lovely view across the fields and allotments (disregarding the blot on the landscape that is the Pentland Centre) was duly unveiled by our local MP, who then shot off. Mrs Angry stood looking over towards her home, spotting the bat infested bell tower of Manorside School next door, (whose occupants are a form of wildlife that in her view is very welcome to move into the Pasture, and stay there).


As our Tory councillors laboured up the hill, they may not have spotted the sign which marks a commemoration of someone few people these days know about, and yet has been such a significant figure in the story of our social history, and the struggle to raise people out of poverty. 

The Victorian philanthropist Octavia Hill lived in this part of Finchley as a girl, and in later life recalled running about the fields and woods here. In a life dedicated to improving the conditions of the less advantaged members of society, she was a pioneer of the radical new idea of social housing, and founded a society that was the first to use home visiting social work in the cause of supporting those in need. 

She was also prominent in protecting open spaces from encroaching urban and suburban development, such as Hampstead Heath, as well as being one of three founders of the National Trust. Stick her on a banknote, says Mrs Angry. 



But how ironic that on Octavia Hill hill, our Tory councillors and MP stood preening themselves on their perceived reclamation of the view across Finchley. 

Just this week, the borough which now prioritises social housing to the deserving poor boasted it was building three new council houses. Three. At the same time, the need for realistically affordable housing is ignored, while developments like the one proposed for Gateway House, visible from the Pasture, will make fabulous returns for the speculators, from the sale of hugely expensive residences. 

And social care? In  Broken Barnet, the philanthropic ideal of public service, and helping our most vulnerable residents to live in comfort and dignity, has been replaced by the rule of market forces, and exploitation, and the pursuit of profit from care, in the shape of Your Choice Barnet.

We have a duty to take hold of our last remaining green places, and protect them for the future, and it is also right to remember the past, and honour the selfless pioneers of reform, who worked for the common good, and made the world a better place for those less fortunate than themselves. A sharp contrast, you might feel, to those in public office here and now, in Broken Barnet.

Tuesday, 1 January 2013

2012: a year in Broken Barnet, Part Two

May

Between the sheets: Matthew Offord takes a firm hand with his constituent

As Councillor Coleman sat morosely in his fixed rent charity flat, and contemplated the course of his own undoing, another local Tory politician seemed bound on a similarly disastrous line of political action: Hendon MP Matthew Offord responded to a constituent asking for his views on same sex same marriage as follows:

'Having waited many years to get married I acknowledge the value the commitment brings. It is my strong personal, moral and religious belief that the institution of marriage is to provide the foundation of a stable relationship in which those two people of the opposite sex procreate and raise a child. That is physically not possible for same-sex couples so I don't see the point of introducing a law to allow this.'

Marriage, citizens, and you know, shh, that thing men and women do - no, not argue and throw saucepans at each other, the other thing - and no, not men and men, women and women - it is for procreation, see? Not pleasure. Are you married? No: stop that fooling around then, AT ONCE. Mrs Angry can see you, and will report you to Dr Offord, (who has been married since just before the last election, but would appear not to have procreated himself yet). 

And yes: Matthew Offord has recently compared equal marriage to polygamy, bigamy, and - even more incredibly - to incest.

May also saw another hugely significant electoral result: against all the odds, the Brunswick Park by election. This was prompted by the death in April of local councillor and former Tory leader Lynne Hillan, and had been widely seen as a very safe seat for the Conservatives, who had decided to nominate Mrs Shaheen Mahmood as their candidate. Mrs Mahmood's campaign was rather interesting, omitting to highlight her important post within the Conservative Muslim Forum, and making some rather eyebrow lifting claims in the electoral literature: 

'Following a successful campaign by your local Conservatives, parking will remain free at the Ward's two car parks in Osidge Lane and Brunswick Park Road and Church Hill Road car park in neighbouring East Barnet Ward ...'

A claim which was untrue and had to be withdrawn, of course, after complaints from  the Labour agent.In fact, local anger over parking and the closure of Friern Barnet library ensured that the Labour candidate won, and the delightful Andreas Ioannides is a very welcome addition to the council: charming, intelligent and conscientious: qualities hard to find amongst the Tory benches, you can be sure.


June

At last, even our dunderheaded Tory councillors realised that the game was up, that their own idiotic policies were going to cause them serious long term electoral damage: but what to do? Tory loss leader Richard Cornelius scratched his head and thought awfully hard about this knotty problem. Nope. Nothing came to mind. But then, in an interview that month in the Barnet Press, we read:  

'I have been asked, says Richard, why on earth did I get involved in local politics?

Quite.  

And Tricky Dicky then proceeded to acknowledge that the parking policy was a mistake, and that he and his colleagues were 'saying sorry'. This eventually led to a vague committment to review the situation, which in turn has led to nothing of the sort, other than some useless tinkering with the new rules and charges.

On to another star of the Barnet Tory group: I say 'star', I mean all round chilled out entertainer, little Robert Rams. Cometh the hour, cometh the man: as the Tory group has fallen into greater and greater disarray, the profile of the Bobster has risen accordingly, the perfect choice to preside over the banquet of fools sitting in governance over us. The blogpost headline which made Mrs Angry laugh the most this year was perhaps this, from the Barnet Eye:

'Robert Rams: 'I have built an imaginary library' ...


Yep, still makes me laugh. Even more so, as the imaginary library has now been demolished. Look, all in ruins. Rams had been bragging on twitter that he was building new libraries, with extended opening hours. He forgot to mention the library he had closed, and of course the so called landmark library, which was supposed to justify the closure, is now not going to be built - if it ever really was.


Rams is said to have his sights on a parliamentary career, but Mrs Angry suspects the hand of fate may intervene


In June the focus of attention of the growing network of activists in the borough became the One Barnet programme, in an attempt to raise the awareness of residents of the reality of the wholescale privatisation of public services endorsed by the Tory councillors, led by a determined senior management team. 

And then, at the end of the month, a most extraordinary story emerged: the story of Helen Michael, and a poster, and a visit from the secret policemen.

July




When Helen Michael first produced her anti parking poster, a complaint was made to local police, apparently on the instigation of Brian Coleman's agent, that she had failed to put her details on the publication, as required by electoral legislation. On the instructions of the Chief Executive and Returning Officer, Nick Walkley, local police came to see her about this omission, for which she immediately apologised, and took steps to amend. The police assured her that they had no further interest in the matter.

On July 3rd, Helen Michael was obliged to spend two hours, under caution, at a police station, being interviewed by two officers from SO15, a counter terrorism unit - supposedly due to the poster and a minor omission which had already been dealt with. Helen was asked questions such as:

What were the reasons behind the poster? 
Were these her own ideas? 
Was it just the local traders who were involved in the production of the poster? 
Was there any political input or intention in production of the poster?

This was a staggering development, even by the standards of Broken Barnet: the cafe owner who dared to challenge a reckless parking policy interrogated by anti terrorist police? Why? Everyone pointed the finger of suspicion at Coleman, and the Chief Executive, but information received by Mrs Angry suggested that the real pretext for the questioning was the approaching arrival of the Olympic Torch in Barnet, and measures being taken to ensure that no disruption would take place along the route. 

The likely pretext, certainly: many other examples around the country demonstrated the excessively high level of scrutiny of local activists potentially planning to take advantage of the Torch relay: quite disproportionate to the real threat of terrorist incidents, of course. But was this just a pretext, and was something else, someone else behind the use of SO15 to put the frighteners on Ms Michael?

And now for something completely different: another trip to parliament, for Broken Barnet, not this time in the person of Mrs Angry, but in name only, named and shamed in the course of a Public Accounts Committee meeting, presided over by the marvellous Margaret Hodge, keen to know all about the use of tax avoiding 'interim' consultants in local government, or 'Town Hall Tax Dodgers, as Eric Pickles prefers to call them.



Earlier this year, the (on and off) Broken Barnet Westminster correspondent and cycling expert, (and now Political Journalist of the year), Mr David Hencke, revealed the extent of tax avoidance so prevalent amongst senior public sector employees such as Ed Lester, the head of the student loan company, who were paid as consultants, through their own companies, thus avoiding high levels of tax and PAYE. Here in Broken Barnet we have long been aware of the number of our own home grown long term 'interim' consultants, who have taken advantage of this wheeze in order to maximise their earnings.

Oh dear. Margaret Hodge summoned Carolyn Downs, the CEO of the Local Government Association, to tell us more about this useful dodge. How many of these posts were there in local government? Ms Downs thought about 13. In the UK, as a whole. 

Margaret Hodge, having  referred to 'a moral duty' to contribute to the public purse,  asked if it was true, then,  that in the London Borough of Broken Barnet there were erm ... NINE such posts? Oh, what a shame, Ms Downs could not speak for Barnet. Who can? Who would? Because in fact, at the time of the meeting, there were at least 14.

Public accounts were an issue back home Broken Barnet, in July, as it happens. 

Mrs Angry, Mr Mustard and Mr Reasonable decided to take advantage of the annual opportunity to inspect the accounts of our council. Oh dear. This is a right enshrined in legislation. The London Borough of Broken Barnet does not consider itself to be subject to the restrictions of the law, however. ( See various examples, including several boxes worth of material currently submitted for Judicial Review ...). 

When we turned up at the council offices at North London Business Park, we were presented not with the documents we had requested, but material that was so heavily redacted as to be rendered totally incomprehensible. 

We were also treated as if we were some sort of terrorist threat, rather than residents exercising their democratic rights: escorted to the loo, in Mrs Angry's case, by a male officer, who waited outside until she was finished, and marched her back to her redacted documents, watching for the moment when she attempted to make a run for it, and run amok in the council offices, stealing paper clips, and using her pinhole lapel camera to take photos of Andrew Travers, asleep at his desk. Hello: Mrs Angry is having a MetPro flashback. (Still lots of interest in this company, btw, judging by recent hits on her blog).


Mr Paul Hughes, the exernal auditor from Grant Thornton, seemed the obvious person to complain to. Mr Paul Hughes didn't really give a shit, however. 

He gave retrospective permission for the redaction of any personal data ( which we were not interested in anyway) on the grounds that individuals might be subject to mention in local blogs, an accusation which Mrs Angry entirely rejects, except in his case, and and serves him right:

http://wwwbrokenbarnet.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/fifty-grades-of-hays.html


Oh dear: it was a very long summer, wasn't it? 

Part Three: eventually. Maybe.

Sunday, 29 January 2012

Mrs Angry's Sunday afternoon

*Update 8.15pm: Brian Coleman threatens to report Mrs Angry to the police!
Yes, really: see below!


Plus:* Monday: an insultingly brief response from Cllr Thompstone regarding the Forum, see half way down.

F*ck this for a game of soldiers: let's upset some Tory councillors instead ...

Mrs Angry hates Sundays afternoons, don't you? Probably a hangover from childhood, in her case, when Sunday meant a grim routine of attending mass, followed by homework, then Sunday lunch, with the terrible ordeal of spinach and brussel sprouts, and Mrs Angry being made to sit at the table until she ate them, which usually involved about two hours sitting sulkily, arms folded, in front of evil, mocking, cold green vegetables, and threatening to throw up. Then more homework, followed by bathtime in an ice cold bathroom with no heating, and a hairwash, and a prolonged episode of crying, or even screaming, as the tangle headed Mrs Angry ran around the house trying to avoid her mother and the hairbrush.

In adult life, or what passes for it, Mrs Angry has eliminated most of these horrors from her Sunday: best of all, no spinach or brussel sprouts. Eurgh. But in adult life you simply swap one set of horrors for another, don't you? And there are always things to do on Sunday that you have put off the rest of the week. Like sending those emails you think about writing, with such relish, at three in the morning, when you can't sleep. Or is that just me?

For example: one to the Chair of our local Residents Forum, the rather grumpy Reuben Thompstone, which has now escaped from the night time wanderings of Mrs Angry's imagination and slipped into the apparently out of office in box of our antipodean councillor:

"Dear Councillor Thompstone,

I would like to ask you the following three questions:

1. As you know, in an attempt to prevent residents from discussing politically sensitive issues of public concern in any council meeting, several amendments to the local consitution were made last year which, amongst other restrictive practices, prevent residents from raising any matter at our Forums which do not meet your definition of 'public works', and we are now forbidden from mentioning, criticising, debating or challenging any aspect of what you consider to be 'council policy'.

At the recent Finchley and Golders Green Residents Forum, several of my questions were excluded from the agenda, including the extremely controversial subject of the proposal by Councillor Brian Coleman, to hire our parks and greenspaces to private customers. These questions were banned despite the fact that they did clearly relate to 'public works', and I was informed in writing by Mr John McArdle, the senior officer in charge of the highly contentious parking scheme, that this was because we may now not raise any matter that is 'boroughwide', even if it is in regard to 'public works'.

Despite the exclusion of my questions, other questions on park hire were allowed, as indeed, rather mystifyingly, a question of mine on the subject of ... park hire. In order to prove the point about the ridiculous new rules on exclusion, I had asked a facetious question about 'dogging', and was amused to see that you are prepared to discuss such an indelicate matter, yet consider a serious and very pertinent set of questions on what is a matter of enormous concern in regard to the proposed hire scheme to be unsuitable for inclusion.

I would like an explanation from you, in your position as Chair of the Forum, as to why this was so, and I would also like to know where in the council's constitution it states that questions regarding boroughwide issues may not now be raised at a Residents Forum.

2. Many of the speakers at last week's Forum were continually interrupted by you and asked to stop speaking, on the pretext that there was not enough time to allow them to express their views, yet the meeting finished early, at 7.20 pm, forty minutes before the end of the time allowed. I suggested to you that you might like to resume the discussion on some of the more contentious issues, but you declined to consider this. May I politely suggest that in future you manage the time better so that the issues which are of so much concern to residents are fully debated and that you do not regard the meetings as something to be endured, rather than an opportunity to engage with the people whose views you are supposed to represent? Which brings me to:

3. At the beginning of the Forum, before I was allowed to raise my question, I expressed my strong objection to the exclusion of my perfectly reasonable questions, and I asked you to explain to me how exactly you thought that the blatant censorship and heavy handed management of the Forums was in anyway compatible with the principles of your own government's new policy of localism, its committment to transparency, accountability and scrutiny, and its stated aim to empower communities to engage more closely with the processes of local government.

You refused to answer this point, saying that you would be happy to answer after the meeting, but at the end of the meeting, with forty minutes to spare, you were still curiously reluctant to discuss this. I would like therefore to offer you the opportunity to explain to me in writing your answer to this question. I am sure that my friend Mr Pickles will be very interested to see what you have to say.

Yours sincerely,

Mrs Angry

cc Eric Pickles"

*Update, Monday:

Subject: Re: Residents Forums in Broken Barnet
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:28:41 +0000
From: Cllr.R.Thompstone@Barnet.gov.uk
To: madashell999@hotmail.co.uk

Thank you for your comments which I have noted.


Regards,

Reuben Thompstone
Councillor for Golders Green
From my Blackberry


Mrs Angry was not pleased with this response - and she imagines Mr Pickles will not be either, Mr Thompstone - and has replied thus:

hmmm, good, but I don't want you just to note my comments, that is not enough, I am afraid. I am asking you to reply to some perfectly reasonable questions: I don't mean to be difficult, but if you are not prepared to explain the policies you are enforcing, perhaps you should consider standing down as Chair of the Forum.

Theresa Musgrove


oh, and while we are feeling mischievous ... in the words of Margaret Thatcher's favourite prayer - Lord, make me a channel of your peace:


"Dear Councillor Coleman,

I was deeply saddened to hear, at this week's full council meeting, that you are too scared to attend the local Residents Forums, due to the 'appalling behaviour' that ensues at such events.

I must agree with you.

To be lectured by our elected representatives in the form of a long list of new regulations at the beginning of such meetings that we, the residents, may not raise any issue at these Forums that is not a matter of 'public works', or that dares to challenge any aspect of 'council policy' is indeed an outrageous affront to civil liberty, and an utterly objectionable assault on the principle of the freedom of expression. Such behaviour is indeed simply appalling, and quite intolerable, and will I suspect be answered in no uncertain terms by voters at the next election.

Oh dear. Not long til May, is it?

In the meanwhile, may I reassure you that if you should feel moved to accept your invitation to the Finchley and Golders Green Residents Association to discuss your immensely popular and successful parking and park hire schemes, you will receive nothing less than a warm welcome - and perhaps some lighthearted heckling, taken, I am sure, in the spirit in which it is intended.

Love and kisses, as always,

Mrs Angry

cc Eric Pickles"

No responses yet, for some reason.

*Update:


Absolutely unbelievable ... oh dear me, Mrs Angry can hardly type for laughing: look at this response just arrived from Councillor Coleman:

I do not accept anonymous e mails which I consider malicious communication and future e mails will be blocked and may be reported to the Police

Right. Excuse me while I reply ... back soon ...

Dear Brian,

You know perfectly well who I am, this is not an anonymous email, and I am perfectly entitled to write to you. If you want to report me to the police for the dreadful crime of sending an email, and yes, I can see that this could be considered an offence of the most awful depravity, I suggest you contact the Acting Borough Commander, who is a regular reader of my blog, and a very nice man, and I am sure that he will be very amused.

Yours as ever,

Mrs Angry xxx