Brian Coleman: So long, Farewell, Auf Wiedersehn, Goodbye ...

*Updated, with statement from Helen Michael, see below:

According to the local Times group reporter Chris Hewett, (details here) Brian Coleman failed to turn up to the Chipping Barnet Conservative Association meeting tonight, where he was due to face a hearing to decide his membership of the party. They voted to expel him.

The vote cast in his absence seals his fate: his suspension from the Conservative Party is final, and although he may continue as an independent councillor until next year's election, his political career is effectively over. 

And he has no one to blame but himself.

Good riddance.

Mrs Angry's spies tell her that Coleman is already talking about standing as an independent councillor in Totteridge next year. 

Good idea, Brian: that will help split the vote nicely between the Tories, UKIP, and your good self. Or stand for UKIP, maybe: you deserve each other, frankly ... Labour win Totteridge? Bring it on.

Tory 'Leader' Richard Cornelius, whose silence on Coleman's conviction for assault has caused much controversy, has still said nothing of the violent attack on cafe owner Helen Michael, but now says of his former colleague's behaviour  

“The situation has been an embarrassment and the actions of one man have embarrassed the whole party. It was difficult but the group had to exclude him.”

An embarrassment: yes, the violent assault of a female resident in the high street is nothing more than 'an embarrassment', Mr Cornelius. Not an outrage, a despicable act of bullying, but something which is of significance because it caused some inconvenience to the Tory councillors of Broken Barnet.

The Tory party in this borough have allowed Coleman to behave with gross disrespect to residents - especially female residents - described only recently, to his colleagues' amusement in the council chamber, as 'sad, mad and a couple of old hags': this indulgence has continued over a period of many years, and the group have always refused to disassociate themselves from such behaviour. The current situation is entirely of their making, and illustrates beyond any doubt their total unsuitability for the responsibilities of public office.

If you need any explanation for the jubilation that is being expressed by the residents of this borough over the downfall of Brian Coleman, you may wish to visit this wonderful site, lovingly compiled by the marvellous Mr John Baldy:

http://101reasonstosackbriancoleman.tumblr.com/

At the end of last week's leaving do for former Director of Corporate Governance, Jeff Lustig, CEO Andrew Travers made a speech, and our Brian stood next to Mrs Angry's brother, muttering throughout. He then turned to Mrs Angry's brother, and started complaining about featuring in this blog, taking objection to the story about him complaining that everything had gone to pot since her brother's retirement (redundancy). (Glad to see you are a regular reader, Brian. I wish I could return the compliment, but one has to draw the line somewhere).

FOR GOD'S SAKE! yelled Mrs Angry's brother at Coleman: DON'T TALK TO ME ABOUT BLOODY BLOGGERS! Apparently Cllr Coleman's jaw dropped, taken back by the impertinence of the formerly well behaved governance officer. 

(Mrs Angry has pointed out to her brother that Brian may also have been alarmed and disappointed at the lack of gushing support for his sister's endeavours ...)

And so: it really is the end of an era now: Coleman will spend the next year skulking on the council fringes, making mischief, and the Tories will continue in private to be chummy with him, whilst ignoring him in the council chamber and committee rooms.

His fall from grace is now complete: from his days of glory at the GLA, when he was permanently out to lunch, and dreamed of being Mayor of London, to his last performance, in the dock in a magistrate's court in Uxbridge - the stuff of tragedy, in fact, were it not for his complete inability to show any remorse for any of the behaviour which has so offended people, and which has been the instrument of his own undoing.

Coleman is history now: our focus moves back to what really matters - the future of One Barnet, a programme which he, ironically, has slated, as soon as it was safe to do so, as an officer led juggernaut hurtling towards disaster ...

We hear now that the Judical Review Appeal will not take place until October - this is apparently entirely due to delays caused by Barnet Council, and leaves the authority in a very difficult position. And our new owners at Capita: they  must be awfully disappointed too. Oh dear. 

Never mind.

Brian: here is a musical tribute from your friends in Broken Barnet:


 

Mrs Angry x

Updated Thursday lunchtime: 

Helen Michael has sent the following statement exclusively to Mrs Angry: 

"On behalf of the traders of Barnet I am glad that this abusive little man can do no more damage. For that reason, as well as the assault, I am glad that at last he has gone.  Shame he was given so much power in the first place.  

As for Richard Cornelius:  he is no leader. He has been led, and badly.  What was/ is he so frightened of?   Even now he has not condemned the actions of Coleman.  It has been proved that he lied time and time again.
  

On behalf of the Tory party in Barnet I should have received an apology at the very least. Disappointing, and a clear indication of what they all feel towards the people of Barnet, and in particular the traders whom I represent".

Brian Coleman: the end of the line - a trial in Metroland

Please stop playing games and talking in code ... enough is enough

 

*Updated 7th May, with an open letter to Tory leader Richard Cornelius - see below

Uxbridge might have seemed an odd choice of location for the trial of Brian Coleman. 

Miles from Barnet, difficult to get to ... no, that in fact seems to be why it was chosen: his reputation is such that a local trial, without prejudice, might be impossible, and it may have been thought that holding it in such a place would deter people from attending. 

In fact, at the original hearing,  it was reported that he appeared to be shocked to find so many local residents had made the effort to come, and the trial itself was of course attended by dozens of people keen to watch or report the proceedings - from Broken Barnet, of course, but also from much further afield. 

Mrs Angry and the Barnet Bugle arrived at Uxbridge via the underground, or rather the overground section of the Metropolitan Line. Ah, mused Mrs Angry, as we passed though the suburban sprawl of Middlesex, gleaming in the spring sunshine, some late blossom only just breaking on the cherry trees: Metroland ... 

Suddenly the venue for Coleman's trial seemed rather fitting - in so many ways a character out of time, old before his time, living in another age of faded, mothballed municipal glory, a world of  petty bourgeois respectability, an  age of deference and tea shops, vicars' daughters and bicycles, golf clubs and whist drives, a world that never really existed, except in the aspirations of the lower middle classes  ...

Gaily into Ruislip Gardens
Runs the red electric train,
With a thousand Ta’s and Pardon’s
Daintily alights Elaine ...

But what dark deeds lie under the carapace of respectability covering such apparent suburban idyll, readers?

Uxbridge is on the outer edges of Metroland, the end of the line. Famous for nothing much, except as the birthplace of Christine Keeler, whose dalliance with Profumo at nearby Cliveden caused the downfall of Harold MacMillan's government, and oh yes, as Mrs Angry discovered, the old Magistrate's Court had been the place where a certain Mr Christie, of 10 Rillington Place, had twice appeared on trial for various motoring offences, before the commencement of his killing spree in Notting Hill. 

At the new magistrate's court yesterday, another trial was listed: Councillor Brian Coleman faced two charges, one of common assault by beating of Finchley cafe owner Helen Michael, and another allegation of a motoring offence relating to the same incident . He had previously appeared in the same court to deny both charges.
 
Mrs Angry and the Barnet Bugle turned up just as the court opened, first to arrive other than a group of cameramen and photographers waiting to catch Councillor Coleman's appearance.

We gave our details, and were given details of the case, Judge Deborah Wright, counsel for the prosecution Manjit Mahal, for the defence, Neville Rudston. 

Coleman arrives at Uxbridge Magistrates' Court with his solicitor

Brian Coleman turned the corner to the court room, saw Mrs Angry sitting waiting there, right next to the door, and appeared rather annoyed to see her, which was most amusing. 

He swept by, muttering something unintelligible, into an interview room with his legal representatives.

In court, a retinue of Barnet bloggers, and reporters from the local and national press sat in the designated seats, which were very few. In the High Court, in both cases recently attended by Mrs Angry, after sending in a card and asking permission there was no problem about sitting in court, or tweeting, or indeed in the facilities for the public. In this small town court, it was very different: Mrs Angry left the well of the court twice, once voluntarily when a young local reporter, turning up late, had a tantrum and wanted her seat, second time after Brian Coleman, via his counsel,  made the usher publicly eject her: on asking why, he said there had been 'a complaint'. 

From whom, demanded Mrs Angry, across the court ... ? The usher pointed at Coleman's solicitor. Mrs Angry laughed. Typical Coleman, more worried about the proximity of his old adversary, than the fact he was about to stand in the dock accused of beating a woman in the street.

The public gallery was sealed off from the court by a glass screen, giving the impression of a large number of badly organised and rather eccentric mafiosi sent to trial for money laundering, or perhaps, bearing in mind we were in Uxbridge, circa 1932,  failing to return some slightly overdue library books. 

There was no amplified sound, and little care given to the need to make the proceedings accessible, or audible. Justice, in Uxbridge, may be seen to be done, but not heard.

For Mrs Angry, who has imperfect hearing, it was something of an ordeal, but did not entirely detract from the degree of satisfaction felt at sitting behind Brian Coleman in the dock, and noting the whole of the wooden edifice which contained him, in his moment of shame, was almost completely covered in a display of scratched and semi-literate graffiti, mostly initials, but rather stupidly, in some cases, full names and dates, left by previous defendants: NEV ... DALE ... T.B. ... 

Mrs Angry checked as we left the room later that day: there appeared to be no BC 3/05/2013. But above the judge, the court's emblem loomed large, and reminded us of the principles of British justice: Honi Soit, Qui Mal Y Pense, and Dieu et Mon Droit. The hearing began.

Coleman stood in the dock and gave his name and date of birth. He declined, however, to give his address. The reasons for this were not given in any detail. Mrs Angry imagined that he was worried about queues of admiring residents wishing to call round and visit him with bouquets of flowers, boxes of chocolates, and fulsome expressions of grateful thanks for all his stirling efforts on their behalf, over the years. 

The judge was not impressed by the defendant's wish to guard his privacy however, and ordered him to give the details - in Essex Park, Finchley, where, despite his formerly handsomely paid posts paid for by the public purse - his income was around £130,000 per year - he has lived for many years in a charity owned flat, at a fixed rate rent.

There were some long and mysterious adjournments before the case began properly, during the course of which it became apparent that some discussions were taking place between both the defendant's and the complainant's team. The result was that at the last moment, Coleman decided to change his plea to guilty on the the charge of common assault by beating, and the motoring charge was dropped. 

It was a highly significant admission, of course.

The website for Coleman's barrister, Neville Rudston, informs us:

"He is an experienced criminal barrister who has represented clients in matters including murder, rape and other serious sexual offences, kidnap, assault occasioning grievous bodily harm with intent, armed robbery, serious fraud and the commercial supply of class A drugs".

It also says: 

"He has appeared in matters in the Court of Appeal and the High Court and has successfully availed clients of a wide variety of defences including duress, necessity and abuse of process, often in the face of apparently overwhelming evidence ..."

Interesting, in this context, perhaps, that our Councillor Coleman was encouraged by the same counsel to plead guilty to the charge of assault. But guilty is what he stated himself to be, in the dock of Uxbridge Magistrates' Court.

After the plea, we were told the facts of the case: that he had parked illegally in a loading bay in the high street in North Finchley - an area where even today, a disproportionate number of traffic wardens prowl looking for hapless residents who have tried to visit their local shops and may have made some error in paying for the privilege of parking. 

There is the largest contingency of traffic wardens in the borough here, concentrated for some reason particularly outside Cafe Buzz, run by anti parking policy campaigner Helen Michael.
 
And for some reason, on the 20th September, Brian Coleman decided to ignore the parking restrictions in North Finchley, which apply to everyone but him, and to park where he wanted, in a loading bay outside the HSBC bank while he visited the cash machine, just along the road. Why this bank, next door to Cafe Buzz, rather than any other bank in Broken Barnet, we do not know.

He was visiting the bank, he claimed, because a young man named Tom had been doing some 'odd jobs' for him, and Tom needed paying in cash.

Helen Michael, the owner of Cafe Buzz,  had appeared with her phone, and proceeded to film or photograph him. He had grabbed her arm and her breast, in order to prevent her from doing so, and returned to his car. He had eventually reported voluntarily to Barnet Police Station, an hour after the incident, and the next day, under questioning, had been shown stills of the CCTV which had recorded the incident, which clearly showed Coleman lunging towards Ms Michael. 

Coleman had kept changing his version of events, and when asked about how the injuries to her wrist and the scratches she had had been sustained, could not explain it. An officer had pointed out that Councillor Coleman had long nails. He denied any allegations but today had changed his plea. The prosecution wanted costs, compensation, and a discussion over a potential restraining order.

Coleman referred to 'a campaign of harrassment' and his counsel pointed out that he was of 'previous good character' - the incident had happened in a moment of 'anguish', following 'a lengthy campaign'.  He had now studied the CCTV footage and could add very little. It had been 'a very fast moving event'. Your analysis, it was suggested, was as good as his.

Mmm.

The court now watched footage from the CCTV recording. 



Although seen from a distance, the film was compelling viewing. We all sat in silence, watching the figure of Brian Coleman approach the cash machine, Helen Michael come out of her cafe and film him from a distance, and then, the lunge he made at her, at some speed, and the prolonged tussle, or rather attack, which ensued. People in the public gallery gasped. Monster! yelled one woman. It was truly a shocking sight. 

Mrs Angry reflected on yet another curious example of the peculiar energy which runs through this part of Broken Barnet, along the suburban High Road that once led people to Finchley Common, a notorious area where ruthless highwaymen laid in wait and innocent travellers went in fear of their lives. Centuries later, this territory is still a place of danger, an interface of conflict, a gaping faultline where it all falls apart, sooner or later.

In mitigation, it was stated that Coleman was of previously good character. This was met with some derision from the public gallery. He had devoted his life, we were told, to public service. You can imagine the reaction to that.

'Do I gather', asked the judge drily, 'that the people in the public gallery are not supporters?'

There was, as you might expect, a certain amount of enthusiastic response to that suggestion.

Coleman's counsel continued his attempt at mitigation. The incident had taken place on 'a street where he knows he is hated'. There had been a campaign directed at him: some of done 'very very improperly'. Mrs Angry dabbed at her eyes with a tissue, deeply moved.

Mention was made of all Coleman's former positions on the GLA, fire authority, etc etc. He looked on from the dock, bristling with self importance, not realising that it appeared all the more awful that someone who had been entrusted with such responsibilities had behaved in such a manner. In fact the most telling act of the day was this: he abruptly interrupted his own counsel to interject an ill timed reminder that he had forgotten to say he had been Mayor of Barnet. 

In Coleman's pathetic distortion of suburban values, rooted in a past that never was, with authority bestowed by a chain of office, and all the pantomime of municipal ceremony, this achievement above all else is the one whose memory he treasures, representing something to him we can only guess at: a vindication, a mark of status in his home territory: an acceptance by an establishment only he feels the need from which to demand endorsement. This world he lives in no longer exists, if it ever did, and travelling back into the heart of Metroland to find justice proved to be a fool's errand.

Apart from trying to blame his violent assault on a campaign directed on him, Coleman tried once more to claim that his octogenarian mother had as a result been the victim of an unspecified assault as a result: this claim is one he has trotted out before, in different circumstances, in a defamatory post on his ludiocrous blog, in which he blamed local bloggers for 'bizarre activities' including an attack in the street on his then 88 year old mother. 

We were invited then to feel sorry for his misfortunes: losing his seat on the Assembly, being now on ' a very limited income', personal difficulties for which the complainant, ie Ms Michael, claimed the credit. 

Mrs Angry was again moved to tears, especially when we were asked to imagine the anguish felt by the defendant, after months of stress, which had driven him to act 'instinctively' in his attack, and now, we were told, many people were going to go away and celebrate his moment of shame - not something most people have to bear. Oh dear, thought Mrs Angry, suddenly overcome with remorse. 

Alright, no: not so much remorse, in fact, as the knowledge of justice done, immense satisfaction,  a feeling of righteousness, and a sense of triumph, the triumph of virtue, at last, here in Broken Barnet.

Judge Wright gave her summing up. It was fair, balanced, and well measured. She stated that in her view, the motive for Coleman's assault was 'to avoid the embarrassment of the publicity of his visit and the parking arrangements he made that day'. As a result of the attack, 'Ms Michael sustained a number of injuries, including scratches to her hands and wrist, soreness to the wrist, her shoulder and in the region of her chest'.

Coleman was fined a total of around £1400, including costs, and compensation to Helen Michael. His counsel asked for 28 days in which the sum should be paid. Coleman was said to earn only around £200 a week, the basis for his fine.

As we left the court, Coleman rushed out, and a member of the public yelled something about his now being a convicted criminal. Helen stood and took questions from the media. She said she was delighted that justice had been served, that Coleman's career was effectively finished, and that 'he had picked on the wrong woman this time'. 

Smiles all round: Helen Michael speaks to BBC London

The experience leading up to the trial had been, she commented ruefully, 'an interesting journey'. She thought that his lying and bullying behaviour meant he was not fit for public office, and that he had 'a problem with women', that people had come to the court that day because they felt he had abused them too.

Outside the court, reporters and cameras crews were waiting for Helen to emerge. She gave interviews to the BBC and ITN, and was her usual articulate, intelligent, courageous self, as you can see from the footage above - which includes a contribution outside court from a woman also known as Mrs Angry. 

Mrs Angry's alter ego, Theresa Musgrove, interviewed by ITN

Immediately after the incident had happened last September, Mrs Angry went to see Helen. She was sitting in her cafe, clearly suffering the after effects of shock: pale, shaking, and simply stunned by what had happened, as indeed were we all. On her arm the marks of her attack were clearly visible.  

Helen Michael is a small woman, of very slight build, and no match for the brute force of a man intent on assaulting her: physically, that is. But she was determined to see Coleman brought to justice, and the police response was instant, and highly supportive. While we were at the cafe news came that he had been arrested, and then detained in a police station: he spent that night in the cells, the thought of which brought no little satisfaction to many of us here, in Broken Barnet.

The months leading up to this trial have put Helen under an almost intolerable burden of stress and anxiety. Apart from struggling to keep her business afloat in the aftermath of Brian Coleman's disastrous parking policy in action, she has been the victim of an horrendous assault, been subjected to a lengthy process leading up to the prosecution, and then an appearance in court. Her powers of endurance, and determination to see justice done, have been outstanding: she is truly a remarkable woman: bright, positive, hard working, full of energy - and very funny. She is also extremely brave.

Throughout this period she has also had to come to terms with the serious illness of her mother, who is now gravely ill, and indeed in the last week Helen has been spending much of her time at the local hospice where her mother is being cared for. She is donating the compensation awarded by the judge from Coleman to the Marie Curie Nurses Fund.

After the assault of Helen Michael took place, Coleman's fellow Tories in Barnet closed ranks, and refused to condemn his actions. Leader Richard Cornelius stood by him, saying he liked Brian, and anyway he was innocent until proven guilty, and that to comment further might prejudice his trial. Quite incredibly, the local Conservative Association did not suspend Coleman, and it was left to the intervention and insistence of the central party to force such a move.

Before the trial, it was clear that misinformation was being spread about the incident. Barnet Tory councillors believed that Ms Michael had in some way set up the assault, that Coleman was the victim of a conspiracy: a story in the Evening Standard here included a suggestion from 'friends of Coleman' that Helen had left him 'scratched and bleeding'. 

Even as late as the morning of the trial, a local reporter told Mrs Angry, shrugging, that Coleman would get off, that he had been told the incident was 'six of one, half a dozen of the other'. That all this was a complete lie was clearly demonstrated in court when the footage of the attack was shown.

What happened was that a woman was attacked and beaten in the street, in full view of witnesses, and a CCTV camera, by a man raging with fury that anyone would dare to hold him to account for his hypocrisy in flouting the injust rules which he had imposed on others.  

Since the conviction, no Tory councillor has commented on the matter. 

Barnet Council has stated there is no need for comment as  Coleman was not on council business when the assault took place.

The silence from both local Conservatives and the local authority is simply indefensible.

A proven act of violence against a woman is being ignored, and dismissed as of no consequence. 

Such an act by any man against a woman is always unacceptable, but when it is made by an elected representative of the community, one who boasts of his long record in public office, and indeed is still here, in this community, a councillor and actively involved in various local bodies, this is even more abhorrant. 

A councillor's behaviour when not on council business most certainly is a matter for the local authority and for the local Tory party to which he belonged, particularly in these shameful circumstances. 

To say otherwise sends a clear message that an assault of this nature is trivial, and that the violent abuse of women is of no consequence - this is clearly utterly unacceptable.

There is a deep rooted misogyny within the heart of Barnet Tories: the party here is dominated, as we have often commented, by a culture that is exclusive of women, marked by an absence of female councillors other than those who are dutiful wives of other councillors, or unthreatening in their submission to the culture of bullying which permeates their group. 

Remember the night in 2010, when Councillor Kate Salinger, the only Tory who dared abstain from supporting the vote for an enormous rise in their allowances, was forced to watch as her colleagues, instructed by the whip Brian Coleman, immediately and publicly remove her, one by one, from every council post she held? Afterwards, Coleman commented smugly to the press as she left the town hall in tears: that's discipline for you.

Remember the other night in the Town Hall, where Brian Coleman, in a speech ranting in support of the One Barnet programme, which weeks later he admitted was a total disaster, abused women in the public gallery, including Mrs Angry, calling them 'sad, mad, and a couple of old hags'? His Tory colleagues laughed, and the Mayor refused to force him to apologise. 

The fear and loathing of women felt by Coleman and his colleagues is a demonstration of their own personal inadequacies, and aggravated by one unpalatable truth: the most effective opposition to their reign of tyranny and incompetence has been instigated and galvanised by women. We have been their undoing: not by any other means other than outwitting them, and holding up a mirror to their ugly, threatening faces. The mirror has cracked, from side to side, and Broken Barnet lies in pieces.

Brian Coleman is the true face, the animus of the Tory party in Barnet, and his repellant behaviour is the nothing less than the active representation of their collective psyche. 

Coleman has disgraced himself, his office, and his party. 

He has been exposed as a liar, and a bully, and he has no place in politics, or public life. But he is the past, and now we look to the future, and to the battle to cleanse this borough of the Tory administration which made him, supported him, and continues to support his policies and his attitudes: continues to demonstrate nothing but contempt for the people who elected them, and an absolute refusal to listen to their views, or to engage in the democratic process.

The assault of Helen Michael: the grotesque struggle and assault which took place is an apt analogy of the struggle between the will of the people of this borough and the Tory administration which seeks to keep us in check.

We will not be kept in check, and we will fight back, and we are fighting back, through the processes of justice, until we regain our freedom, and control over our own future.

Updated: Monday 7th May

An open letter to Richard Cornelius, Conservative leader of Barnet Council.

On Friday 3 May Councillor Brian Coleman pleaded guilty to the charge of common assault by beating of Helen Michael, in the High Road in North Finchley. Evidence from CCTV was shown in court and proved incontrovertibly that this incident was nothing less than an utterly indefensible act of aggression. It resulted from Councillor Coleman being caught parking in a loading bay, trying to evade the hugely controversial parking payment scheme he had imposed on residents in this borough.

Despite the fact that he has now been convicted of a criminal act of assault, Barnet Council has refused to comment, absurdly claiming that this is unnecessary as the attack did not take place while the Councillor was on council business.

Indeed local Tory members, including leader Richard Cornelius, openly continued to support their fellow member after he was charged, and were privately informing others that the story of the assault was false.Councillor Coleman was suspended from the party only after intervention from Conservative Central Office. Since the conviction, local Conservatives have issued no statement.

By his own actions Councillor Coleman has shown himself to be unfit for public office: such bullying behaviour, dishonesty and hypocrisy are not acceptable in an elected representative of the community. We demand therefore that he stand down from his seat in Totteridge, and that the Conservative Party expel him from membership.

We call on Richard Cornelius, as leader of Barnet Council, and on behalf of the Conservative Party in this borough, to apologise to Ms Michael, and to dissociate himself and his colleagues from this appalling incident. 

To remain silent is not an option: to remain silent is to condone an act of violence against a woman, and this was and must always be absolutely unacceptable.

Signed:

Derek Dishman

John Dix

Vicki Morris

Theresa Musgrove

Roger Tichborne

The Count: sacking Brian Coleman, the Broken Barnet way

Mrs Angry's favourite photo of 2012: Andrew Dismore, AM, watched by Barnet CEO Nick Walkley - and Mrs Angry

It was rather a pleasing coincidence, Mrs Angry thought last night, that the political demise of Brian Coleman took place in the shabby genteel surroundings of Alexandra Palace - Ally Pally, the 'People's Palace'.

Built in 1873, this keystone of North London's heritage, a landmark visible on the horizon for miles around, for so many years the centre of news broadcasting, the building has been almost destroyed twice by terrible fires, but has struggled on defiantly into the twenty first century, still an iconic representation of the lives and aspirations of ordinary Londoners. And last night, as we witnessed the end of Brian Coleman's grip on political power on the London Assembly, the lives and aspirations of ordinary Londoners here in Broken Barnet came a little closer to fulfillment, with real hope for the future.

The count for the result of some of the London Assembly consituencies took place yesterday in the enormous hall at Ally Pally. Barnet and Camden's boxes were processed right underneath the famous Willis organ, with its vents puffing steam endlessly throughout the day, like Coleman at a committee meeting.

High up above us, beating its wings helplessly for hours, a mangy looking pigeon tried to find its way through the glass ceiling and escape out into the dreary Haringey sky. Mrs Angry watched it, on and off, throughout the day, but with a rather heartless sense of detachment, as the idea had occurred to her that it was the representation of the electoral process itself. If the pigeon remained, it would be a bad omen.

On arriving at the count, a friend immediately whispered to Mrs Angry that something quite extraordinary had happened. Or so it was rumoured. Totteridge ward - yes, Totteridge, Brian's own ward, suposedly the safest Tory seat in Barnet, if not much of North London - had voted for Andrew Dismore! What? No - thought Mrs Angry. Impossible. Don't believe it. If true, though ... Coleman has lost, and spectacularly, catastrophically badly.

As it happened, Coleman had lost. And lost spectacularly, catastrophically badly.

Andrew Dismore's polled 74,677 votes: Brian Coleman only 53,378. The turn out in Barnet was 6% higher than the London average - in other words, people were falling over themselves to get to the polling stations in order to #sackbrian. And Brian was sacked.

Green Party candidate AM Poppy came a very respectable third, with 17,904 votes, and pleasingly, the treacherous, mewling Libdems (although the local candidate seemed to be a very nice guy) could only persuade 13,800 residents of Barnet to trust them once more with their support.

As ballot papers were registered, scanned, verified and stored, the results showed on screens, with bar charts indicating the race between the red Labour votes, and the blue Conservatives. Except there never was a race. From the start, Dismore was leading. We all held our breath, waiting for the 25% mark of verified papers, which is held to be statistically significant. It came and Dismore had increased his marginal distance ahead of Coleman. We began to feel confident of success.

We being a coalition of interested parties, of course. Labour party supporters, Greens, Tories, couple of bloggers, residents ... we spent the day together in solidarity with a common cause, the cause that has united so many diverse sections of our community in one determination - the determination to stand up to the mindless tyranny of our Tory council, and its personification in the strutting, bullying nonentity that is, or was, Brian Coleman.

There were plenty of Labour party councillors, activists, members from Barnet present at the count. There were no representatives from the Barnet Conservative group, not one councillor, no local party activists. It was an extraordinary state of affairs - the only people associated with Coleman were his agent from Camden, David Douglas, and his personal assistant, and later on a few members of the Camden Conservative association. As the day progressed, and the reality of their candidate's failure, and the scale of his failure hit home, Mrs Angry felt rather sorry for them, in fact.

From all their enthusiastic tweetings and website updates, followed with a fair amount of mirth and disbelief by those of us in Barnet, it was clear that they had no idea of the extent of fear and loathing engendered here in this part of the constituency by their man. They were genuinely stunned by his defeat: and to be fair, they had worked very hard to try to support his campaign in the limited areas of the constituency where his name would not immediately provoke a volley of abuse from canvassed voters. Next time, guys, maybe choose a candidate who deserves such loyalty.

Fear and loathing, particularly the latter, here in this borough, as a result of his activities as a councillor, has for Brian Coleman, been the undoing of his career at the London Assembly.

His campaign was lost not on the basis of anything he has done, or not done in City Hall - difficult to tell with Assembly members anyway, as they seem to do very little.

No, Coleman's campaign was lost on the streets of Broken Barnet: in the shops, in the parks, in the council chamber, in every dismissive word he has spoken, every rude email he has sent to constituents, every absurd, defiant statement he has made in public - and every increasingly outrageous policy decision he has imposed, with his relentless drive for pointless, self defeating, revenue extorting measures - policies that have caused such difficulty for residents here, and upset so many sections of the community.

Fatally for Coleman, his arrogance convinced him that he could afford to push through such measures without any reaction from the Tory voters who have re elected him so faithfully, so many times. His monstrous ego had reached such extremes of self indulgence that the possibility that his behaviour might have personal consequences for his own political well being simply did not occur to him. It seems incredible, now, but that is the truth.

In the late afternoon at last a familiar Barnet Tory face arrived at the count: Leader Richard Cornelius, who greeted the assembled Dismore supporters with his usual good manners, and then stood about rather looking as if he wished he were not obliged to be there. By now, of course, it was clear that Coleman could not win.

Finchley shop keepers' spokeswoman Helen Michael spoke to him and asked what would happen now. She told Mrs Angry, with no little amusement, that Cornelius had expressed the hope that some more positive use might now be found for Brian Coleman's talents.

We speculated as to what sort of alternative occupation might suit Coleman. Helen thought carefully and decided that she might be able to offer,as a community based initiative, some sort of work placement in Cafe Buzz, clearing tables, and washing dishes, as a way of supporting his reintroduction - or introduction, into the world of work. Real work, in the 'real world', Brian.

A cold chill entered the hall. Local Tory MP for Finchley and Golders Green, Mike Freer, still trembling from his encounter with Mrs Angry at Westminster a couple of weeks ago, had appeared, as if from nowhere, amongst the crowd of Camden Tories, huddled together like a herd of frightened sheep in a corner of a pen. Freer was grim faced.

Mrs Angry cast a look up at the glass ceiling. The pigeon was gone.

The final result was approaching. A beaming Andrew Dismore entered the hall to thunderous applause.

Mike Freer deliberately turned his back.

A rumour filtered through that Coleman had arrived. As demonstrated in this clip, courtesy of the Barnet Bugle & BBC politics show, our former AM was less than happy to be filmed as he made his way to the count:

No one had been certain whether or not he would even turn up, if he was sure to lose. He did appear, arm in arm with his mother, and walked through the hall to his Camden supporters. We had already agreed that we would behave ourselves, and not taunt him, feeling smug enough to feel this was unnecessary, but what was surprising was that he received no reponse at all from anyone: his own people were silent, and downbeat. No applause, no sympathetic cheer. Brian stood talking to his group, struggling to maintain a somewhat wan smile, but unable to entirely disguise the humiliation of the moment. Richard Cornelius stood looking on, his hands clasped behind his back as if trying to disassociate himself from the whole ghastly mess.

Helen Michael and Mrs Angry and Citizen Barnet positioned themselves in front of Coleman, arms folded, standing there like the Fates descending in fury on their earthbound victim, grinning horribly, and revelling in his discomfiture, on behalf of everyone in Broken Barnet who has ever had their own personal experience of this man's outrageous behaviour. It was a memorable moment. Coleman looked at Mrs Angry in disgust and muttered to his cronies. Mrs Angry laughed.

Revenge is sweet, and yes, it is a dish best served cold, Councillor Coleman.

It was time to go to the Palm Court for the result. A sulky looking Chief Executive Nick Walkley made the formal announcement, and, accompanied by an explosion of cheers and applause, Andrew Dismore was declared the new member for the London Assembly for Barnet & Camden.


The new member's speech, which you can see here,



made several interesting points. He did not descend to the depths explored by his rival in the acceptance speech four years ago, in which he attacked the Labour candidate, asserting that she had blood on her hands, and then, ridiculously, stormed off with his mum, declaring 'the king of bling is back'.

Andrew thanked everyone who had helped him - including the bloggers of Broken Barnet, and observed, as Mrs Angry has done, that Coleman's failure is in no part due to his refusal to move into the twenty first century, and meet the challenges of campaigning and engaging with the electorate by exploiting the opportunities of social media, blogging, tweeting, and so on. Mrs Angry suspects that Brian's problem is not so much with the demands of social media as with the concept of democracy itself, the need to engage with the electorate, to remember at all times that he is only in post by the consent of the electorate, and that it is an honour and a privilege to serve your community in this way.

Dismore's speech was to be the only one: the Tory candidate, for once in his life, had nothing to say. In many ways this was a surprisingly submissive reaction by Coleman. But in truth he was clearly in a state of shock and unable publicly to admit defeat.

With great discourtesy and gracelessness, as Andrew Dismore began his speech, Coleman took his mother's arm and they moved out of the Palm Court, and down the steps of Ally Pally, into a brave new world.

In the People's Palace, the people had spoken: as he recently told a resident daring to ask a question of a Barnet council committee:

You've had your answer - now clear off.

What happens next?

This week sees the AGM of the Tory group in Barnet. It gives leader Richard Cornelius the chance to remove Coleman's cabinet post, and change the course of this borough's political direction. If he fails to do so, he will be acting in deliberate defiance of the will of the residents of this borough, so clearly expressed this week in the ballot box. If Cornelius really is the decent man he would like us to think he is, and indeed if he has any real pretence to leadership, he will have the courage to act - if not, he will be consigning the fate of his party to history at the next local election, because the political survival of Brian Coleman, here in Barnet, will prove to be the irritant in the oyster shell which will produce the pearl of a Labour victory in 2014.


Barnet Tory leader Richard Cornelius wishes he was elsewhere

Helen Michael poses in front of Coleman and his few supporters

Coleman kisses his GLA career goodbye, as MP Mike Freer looks on.

Sunday postscript:

Uploading the last three pictures above, which Mrs Angry obtained last night, she was reminded of an observation she had made at the count, but had only half considered at the time.

As the last picture illustrates, the only real gesture of sympathy and support for Brian Coleman in the immediate circumstances of his defeat was shown by a visit from local MP Mike Freer, above left.

Freer, Mrs Angry was told by a Tory source not so long ago, still exerts, or has exerted, directly and indirectly, a fair amount of influence on the local political leadership here in Broken Barnet. This may surprise many people. It shouldn't.

Everything we are about to experience as a result of the massive One Barnet outsourcing programme, whereby all our council services are being sold off to profit hungry private sector companies, is the legacy of Mike Freer and his adoption of the 'Easycouncil' agenda. Easycouncil became Futureshape, and is now rebranded as One Barnet, but it is the same project. When it was first adopted, Freer promoted himself as the architect of the whole concept, and when he stood for parliament, he may just have persuaded some people that he was some sort of political genius on the basis of this rather dodgy gambit.

In truth, the easycouncil model is a variation on a theme common in rather too many local authorities throughout the country, and in every example the resulting move to mass outsourcing has ended in failure, to a lesser or greater degree. Remember Suffolk, and Kent?

You can trace the pathway back to companies like BT, Capita, Serco, all of whom have huge interests at stake, and there are networks such as the chief officers' association, SOLACE, which are involved in supporting the same wildly ambitious commercialisation of local authority service provision.

At the count, Freer appeared to be very displeased by the defeat of his Barnet friend. More than displeased: furious, and deeply concerned.

Was he worried that such a tidal wave of rejection for a Tory candidate might recur at the next general election, and jeopardise his seat, in a constituency formerly held by a Labour MP?

Or was he anxious about the future course of direction for the Tory administration in charge of Barnet Council, and the progression of the One Barnet programme?

A message for you, Mike Freer, from Mrs Angry.

You should be worried. Look at what we acheived, that night in Ally Pally.

Through a coalition of opposition, a new network of resistence, and an unprecedented campaign driven by bloggers, activists, and ordinary residents, we have brought down your mate Brian Coleman from what was seen as an unassailable position of power, and we have brought that power back to where it should belong: within the community our elected Tory representatives are supposed to support, but have ignored at every turn, as they pursue their own self interest.

Brian Coleman is finished: now we have to turn our attentions to Barnet Council, and wrest back control of the borough from the grubby little hands of our Tory tyrants in the Town Hall.

Oh, and after that ... look, Mr Freer, and Mr Offord, and even Mrs Villiers: here comes the next general election.

Are you feeling quite as confident about your prospects as you did this time last week?

Friday joke: We Need To Talk About Brian

For any parents at the end of their tether: especially Boris Johnson and Lynton Crosby.

And now Mrs Angry is going out into the real world for a lovely walk in the sunshine.

Have a nice weekend. x