Mrs Angry finds that outsourcing can be much more fun than she realised ...
and goodness me, look: here's a story - newly outsourced Brian Coleman makes friends in Swiss Cottage ... or is he applying for a job as a trolley attendant?
... alternatively, he may have to revert to his former career in hip hop ...
Anyway ... you see, a letter in this week's local Times caught Mrs Angry's eye the other day:
Brian Coleman is top of my list
"With the planned reduction in staff proposed by Barnet Council to save millions and the intended out-sourcing of planning, parking and other services, I ask why do we will still need so many councillors?
They are an obvious drain on the ratepayers’ purse, so their number needs to be reduced.
Top of the list I suggest, is Councillor Brian Coleman. Not a week goes by it seems without a letter of complaint about him in your paper; or an article illustrating how he ignores the views of residents and forces his ideas and wishes through, regardless of the implication to the electorate.
Come on Totteridge ward do the right thing for the sake of all Barnet residents and de-select him.
Mrs Rosalind Morgan
Sunnyfield, Mill Hill "
Citizen Mrs Rosalind Morgan, of Sunnyfield, Mill Hill:
Mrs Angry salutes you and commends your Broken Barnet seasick blue* sky thinking.
You have been shortlisted for this year's Broken Barnet Civic Awards, Category: Telling Brian Coleman Off in a Local Newspaper.
This is a well timed letter, as it happens. Mrs Angry has just been browsing through the recently published Delegated Powers Reports, and admiring the sheer audacity of the one signed by Councillor Coleman's favourite officer, Ms Pam Wharfe, which authorises a contract to a company, one of three tendering, but, goodness me, the other two dropped out - the contract will involve handing over £80,000 of our money in order to remove all pay and display machines in the borough. Marvellous use of resources, ain't it? Spending all that dosh on getting rid of something every driver in the borough wants to keep?
But look here, what is this? The very next DPR, as it happens, is a very interesting document. Due to commercial sensitivity, of course, some details have been redacted by Mrs Angry.
DELEGATED POWERS REPORT NO: 1961
SUBJECT: Contract - to Mrs Angry: for the removal of Brian Coleman from the borough
Wards affected: All
Trade Union Response: N/A, but proposal received with ill disguised glee and widespread celebration by Unison membership.
1. RELEVANT PREVIOUS DECISIONS
1.1 Numerous reports by Mrs Angry detailing urgent need of procurement of new councillor services, to be provided externally, which is anticipated to provide the Council with a significantly more efficient service and financial savings, and allow the Council to provide a better, more efficient administration of the borough.
2. CORPORATE PRIORITIES AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS
2.1 The removal of the ageing and underperforming Tory councillor infrastructure as part of the democratisation of the constitution contributes to One Barnet's principles of 'A relentless drive for efficiency' and the Corporate priorities of 'Better services for less money' and 'A successful London suburb' whilst generally retaining the service options and improved street scene through the removal of Brian Coleman and ultimately improved confidence in the administrative regime in the borough.
3. RISK MANAGEMENT ISSUES
3.1 The existing Tory councillor infrastructure is not operating efficiently due to an ageing stock and a lack of maintenance contracts or performance appraisals, (other than by Mrs Angry). There is a risk that retention of Brian Coleman and the current stock of Tory councillors will continue to incur high maintenance and running costs, problematic enforcement, vandalism, and impact on income.
4. EQUALITIES AND DIVERSITY ISSUES
A full Equalities Impact Assessment was undertaken on the implications of removing Brian Coleman from the London Borough of Broken Barnet, and it was considered that although all certain Tory councillors consider themselves to be more equal than others, no such exception should be made in this case.
5. USE OF RESOURCES IMPLICATIONS (Finance, Procurement, Performance &
Value for Money, Staffing, IT, Property, Sustainability)
5.1 In compliance with Contract Procedure Rule 666 and Table 69, three quotations were requested and returned. However, once the specifications were confirmed and the programmed timetable provided, two of the tenderers were threatened by Mrs Angry and voluntarily and spontaneously decided to leave the country, leaving only one option available.
5.2 The proposal is to pay a fee of £2.20 to remove Brian Coleman. This will allow for his bus fare home, and will be precipitated by a short, swift, well aimed kick up the arse by Mrs Angry on behalf of the long suffering citizens of Broken Barnet. Mrs Angry will receive a One Barnet 'arrangement' in return, £1.3 million in cash in total, paid in brown envelopes slid across the table of Costa Coffee, N20, every Monday morning: no questions asked.
6. LEGAL ISSUES
No one gives a flying fuck.
7. CONSTITUTIONAL POWERS
Alternative Consitution, Part I, Section 1:
This is Broken Barnet, and Mrs Angry can do whatever she wants.
Oh, and er - Brian: do hand me back your parking permit before you go ... there's a good chap.
Mrs Angry x
*(seasick blue, One Barnet corporate colour, copyright Mr Mustard 2011)